Public Sector Litigation
Public Sector Litigation
Our team of seasoned trial and appellate attorneys has prosecuted and defended some of the most challenging, complex, and high-profile cases involving governmental agencies and the public sector. Drawing upon decades of collective experience, we guide clients through the process of both defending and bringing lawsuits on behalf of public entities.
The public sector as a whole, and local public agencies in particular, face many legal, political, and policy issues that do not arise in the private sector. Hanson Bridgett has specialized knowledge and experience in handling these matters, and are sensitive to the fact that our public agency clients are often accountable to multiple boards, the public and community at large, the media, elected officials, and other constituents. Our clients depend on our specialized understanding, local knowledge, and keen instinct for practical solutions. We are particularly skilled in thwarting and aggressively defending high profile, high impact litigation and working with elected officials and staff to seek creative solutions to resolve public controversies.
Whether through negotiation, mediation, arbitration, or litigation, we handle all types of disputes facing the public sector, from First Amendment and voting rights suits, to the right to acquire property for a public project, or defend against a catastrophic personal injury claim.
Experience
We litigate individual, multi-plaintiff, and class action claims involving a broad spectrum of issues. Below are some recent examples of types of matters we are litigating:
- Breach of contract, including Joint Powers Agreements and inter-agency Memoranda of Understanding
- Challenges to fees, charges, assessments, and taxes
- Eminent domain and inverse condemnation
- Environmental claims, including under the California Environmental Quality Act and the Hazardous Substances Account Act, as well as their federal counterparts (see our Environmental page)
- Labor and employment actions, particularly wage and hour claims
- Employee benefits matters, including pension and retiree benefits
- Constitutional and administrative claims, including class actions involving California Government Code §11135 and Title VI (42 U.S.C. § 2000d), 42 U.S.C. § 1983
- Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, including civil rights challenges pertaining to the delivery of medical and mental health care in correctional settings
- Right to privacy under the U.S. and California Constitutions
- Personal injury and catastrophic loss suits
- Real estate, including boundaries, encroachments, and land use disputes
- Public works of construction claims
- Energy, and water resource matters
- Civil rights claims
- Challenges to local ordinances
- Enforcement of local ordinances and permits
- Voting Rights Act matters
- Americans with Disabilities Act compliance
- Appellate challenges
Key Contacts
News & Resources
Trial Court Finds That Sonoma County’s Groundwater Well Ordinance Violates the Public Trust Doctrine
What Recent Supreme Court Rulings Mean for Environmental Laws in California
Recent U.S. Supreme Court rulings will not directly affect facial challenges to void a California regulation, nor will they affect whether and how courts defer to California agencies' interpretations of California statutes.
DOJ Mandates Website Standards: Justice Department Sets New Technical Requirements for State and Local Entity Websites and Deadlines for Compliance
On April 24, 2024, the DOJ published a Final Rule establishing technical requirements for web accessibility by public agencies. The Final Rule goes into effect on June 24, 2024 and applies to public entities, including special districts.
California Court Reaffirms that Litigation Threat Letters Should be Treated as Claims Under the Government Claims Act
Fourth District Court of Appeal Wades Into Government Claims Act Split and Warns Public Entities To Treat Litigation Threat Letters as Claims or Risk Waiving Defenses
Inadequate Government Claims Act Notice Sinks Proposition 218 Water Rate Challenge
The Plata v. City of San Jose court decision found that the late charges were not governed by Proposition 218.
New California Court of Appeal Decision Upholds Decisions Made By County Retirement System During Great Recession
O’Neal v. StanCERA, et al. provides helpful guidance to public retirement boards about the considerations relevant to the discharge of their fiduciary duties.